The Ombudsman for Children\u2019s Office understands that the report of An Bord Snip Nua (the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programmes) contains a proposal to merge the Ombudsman for Children\u2019s Office with other organisations and to subsume this collective within the Office of the Ombudsman.<\/p>\n
Such a move would effectively abolish the distinct and independent nature of the Ombudsman for Children\u2019s Office. The Ombudsman for Children\u2019s Office is firmly against this proposal and wishes to put on record why such a move would be wrong.<\/p>\n
We must learn the lessons from the Report of the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse (the Ryan Report). The Ryan Report tells us that we must ensure that children come first; above personal, professional or institutional loyalty, above all else.<\/p>\n
The Ombudsman for Children\u2019s Office is the only independent statutory body charged by law to do its work in the best interests of the child.<\/strong><\/p>\n It is the only Office expressely charged by law to listen to children and to voice their concerns.<\/strong><\/p>\n It is the only Office expressely charged by law with investigating complaints from children.<\/strong><\/p>\n The Ombudsman for Children\u2019s Office was established by the Oireachtas, by the people for the people. Its role is to be a champion for children, to be with the most vulnerable and to ensure their voices are heard.<\/strong><\/p>\n The Ombudsman Office was set up back in 1980. Clearly, the Oireachtas saw a need for a distinct Children\u2019s Ombudsman with unique powers and functions because, 22 years later, it established the Ombudsman for Children\u2019s Office. Are we to believe, in the aftermath of the Ryan Report, that the need for a distinct Office today has diminished in any way?<\/p>\n To merge the Ombudsman for Children\u2019s Office with a range of other bodies, none of which have any express powers or functions related to children would be to do damage to this unique mandate established for our most vulnerable children.<\/p>\n Such a merger would also require extensive legal change imposing a significant burden on the Oireachtas and the public service with no return for children.<\/p>\n \u201cThis proposal does not make political or economic sense. It does not accord with the mood of the public in the aftermath of the Ryan Report nor does it accord with the mood of those senior members of Government the Office has met with in recent weeks to discuss the implementation of the Ryan Report. This proposal is unexpected, surprising and was not discussed with our Office.\u201d<\/p>\n Given all that we know about the capacity of society, administrators and institutions to do serious harm to children, these unique powers must be protected and the independence of the Office guaranteed now and into the future.<\/p>\n Speaking today, Emily Logan said:<\/p>\n \u201cthe Ryan report shows us just what happens when children are not listened to. As a country, we have promised never to let those abuses of children happen again. My job \u2013 and that of my office \u2013 is to speak up for children and to investigate wrongdoing. It is just inconceivable that the distinct and independent nature of my office would be tampered with, diminishing the ability of my office, with its powers and specialised skills, to speak up for the abused child, the trafficked child, the disabled child, the child in care. I do not believe that that is where we as a society want to go. And I trust this is not where the Government wants to go, regardless of what An Bord Snip\u2019s report may or may not say.\u201d<\/p>\n